Previous Page  18 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 18 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

18

PCPD News

私隱專員公署通訊

Issue no. 30

公署動態

PCPD in Action

的問題是該些中介公司在其網站展示申

請人、其家屬及其前僱主(包括香港僱

主)的個人資料。

外傭的工作性質有別於其他工種,她們

需要長時間與僱主及其家庭成員共同生

活,朝夕相對的程度猶如家人般關係密

切。因此,私隱專員接納該些中介公司

為協助準僱主挑選合適家傭,而在網上

披露大部分申請人提供的個人資料(包

括其相片)。然而,私隱專員不認同中

介公司在網上披露申請人的姓名、住

址、護照號碼或香港身份證號碼,他認

為這些資料無助準僱主挑選合適外傭。

基於同一原因,在網上披露申請人家屬

的個人資料(例如姓名、年齡及職業)

及其前僱主的姓名及住址也是不被接

納的。

私隱專員表示:「中介公司應該對申請

人提供的個人資料逐一慎重考慮,絕不

可以在網上披露與申請人求職目的並無

直接關係的個人資料。這做法與直接向

親身到中介公司的準僱主披露個人資料

截然不同,分別是申請人提供的個人資

料一旦在網上公開,便可能被不知名的

第三者隨意查閱、複製甚至永久保存,

及與其他零碎但屬同一人的個人資料整

合。任何人也難以預料及控制誰人可以

再次使用有關資料。」

改善措施及執法行動

私隱專員欣悉部分外傭中介公司已在調

查期間採取了相關的改善措施。為確保

有關機構完全遵守條例規定,私隱專員

已向該十家外傭中介公司及五間經營補

習中介網站的公司分別送達執行通知,

指令他們要採取措施糾正尚有違例的情

況,例如採用編號以代替在網上指示申

請人姓名等,以及防止違例的情況再次

發生。

機構及消費者都必須了解,進行電子商

貿活動及使用網上服務平台可能帶來私

隱風險,例如資料外洩、資料被不明人

士再使用,從而對當事人造成不必要的

滋擾及身份盜竊。經營網站的機構須確

保它們收集及使用的個人資料真正符合

業務所需,而消費者習以為常地在網上

向服務供應商提供個人資料亦應多加警

惕,不要因為急於獲取某些服務而白白

犧牲自己的個人資料私隱。

私隱專員補充:「作為良好的行事方式

(而非只為遵守條例規定),即使申請

人的有關個人資料客觀地有助準僱主挑

選合適家傭,我建議外傭中介公司在網

上披露該些資料前,最好先取得申請人

的同意。鑑於網上披露資料所帶來的私

隱風險,及部分資料屬敏感性質,這良

好的行事方式是更妥善的做法。外傭中

介公司須尊重申請人的選擇,不應上載

申請人表示不同意在網上披露的個人資

料。」

公署將聯同有關商會於

2014

12

月至

2015

1

月期間舉行三場講座,協助

外傭中介公司了解條例的規定。

調查報告全文:

(補 習 中 介 網 站)

www.pcpd.org.hk/

tc_chi/enforcement/commissioners_

findings/investigation_reports/files/

R14_19675_c.pdf

(外 籍 家 庭 傭 工 中 介 公 司)

www.

pcpd . o r g . hk / t c _ ch i / en f o r c emen t /

commissioners_findings/investigation_

reports/files/R14_1382_c.pdf

The PCPD published two investigation

reports on 20 November 2014. One

report revealed six tutorial service

agency websites in breach of Data

Protection Principle ("DPP") 1(1) of the

Ordinance for unnecessarily collecting

the Hong Kong Identity Card ("HKID

Card") numbers of private tutors and

the personal particulars of their contact

persons during online registration.

About 520,000 persons were affected.

The other investigation report revealed

10 major employment agencies for

domestic helpers in breach of DPP3 for

posting on their websites the personal

da t a o f ove r s e a s j ob app l i c an t s ,

members of their families and their

past employers (including Hong Kong

employers).

Tutorial Service Agency Websites

The investigation covered five website

operators and six websites. Job seekers

who wished to be enrolled in the

placement service must provide their

HKID Card number and a contact

person with name, telephone number

and relationship with the job seeker.

This amounted to excessive collection

of personal data by the websites.

The websites argued that collection of

the HKID Card numbers was necessary

to authenticate the identity of the job

seekers to prevent impersonation and

other improper or fraudulent activities

which could be committed by job

seekers to the detriment of the websites

and/or the parents and students. In

fact, the website operators are not

employment agencies regulated under

the Employment Ordinance, so they

have no legal obligation to collect

job seekers' HKID Card numbers.

Ope r a t i ng on a l ow- co s t mode l ,

they do not interview job seekers in

person for employment checking and

identity verification, so collecting job

seekers' HKID Card numbers online for

identification is a farce.

The website operators also explained

t h a t t h e y r e q u i r e t h e n ame a n d

telephone number of the job seeker's

con t ac t pe r s on a s a f a l l - back o r

emergency contact in the event the

job seeker cannot be reached or gets

into trouble. While these explanations

may make sense on some occasions

for some job seekers, job seekers must

be given the option of not providing a

contact person with name and telephone

number. The mandatory provision of the

data should not be made a prerequisite

for service enrolment.

Employment Agencies for Foreign

Domestic Helpers

The investigation covered 10 major

emp l oymen t agenc i e s f o r f o r e i gn

domestic helpers registered under the

Employment Ordinance. Their business

is to recruit job seekers from overseas

for placement as domestic helpers with

employers in Hong Kong. The major

problems revealed in the investigation

w e r e p o s t i n g o n t h e a g e n c i e s '

respective websites the personal data

provided by the job seekers, which

related to the job seekers themselves,

their family members and their past

emp l oye r s , i nc l ud i ng Hong Kong

employers.

Domestic helpers perform their jobs

in unique circumstances, in that they

live with the family of their employer

and are often treated as a member of