Previous Page  13 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 13 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

13

PCPD News

私隱專員公署通訊

Issue no. 29

H e s a i d t h e a s s u m p t i o n t h a t

anonymisation was a solution for privacy

protection was no longer valid. For

example, in the case of sensitive data,

he said we must distinguish between

biometric data, like DNA, which cannot

be changed, and other personal data, such

as bank records. Anonymisation of one’s

DNA data does not serve the effect of de-

identifying the data. “Yet ultimately, we

have to frame and address these privacy

risks – either by looking at the principles,

or looking at the implementation (of the

principles),” he said.

When sharing experiences in tackling

privacy issues, Mr Niva stressed the need

to do everything that can be done to

protect data privacy. “For example, there

are cases in which a user can be easily

identified, as there may be only one

person in a tiny service area in Finland,”

he grinned. “But does that mean we

should not de-identify the data? Of

course not.”

As t he d i s cus s i on d r ew t o c l os e ,

P r i vacy Commi s s i one r , Mr A l l an

Chiang

, observed that the increased

use of the Internet and advanced

technologies posed challenges to

p r i v a c y p r o t e c t i on , and t ha t t he

‘Do No Evil’ case, which the PCPD

released in an investigation report

last year, was an illustrative example

of this. He pointed out that the case

had created a lot of discussion in

the community. He concluded that

although the law could never keep up

with the specifics, the principle-based

approach of our privacy law was still

very good. “Further, the accountability

principle, although not part of the

Hong Kong data protection law, is

still valid,” he said. “We can always

address a privacy issue by asking

whether the collection or use of data

in question is fair.”

會議參與者

Participants of the Meeting

海外

Overseas

• Ms Bojana Bellamy, President, Centre for Information Policy Leadership, UK

• Mr Manuel Maisog, Partner, Hunton & Williams, UK

• Mr Mikko Niva, Director of Privacy, Nokia, Finland

• Ms Laura Juanes Micas, Director of International Privacy, Yahoo!, US

• Ms Christina Peters, Chief Privacy Officer, IBM, US

• Mr Luca Probst, Attorney, Asia Pacific Legal, UPS, US

• Ms JoAnn Stonier, Chief Information Governance & Privacy Officer, MasterCard,

US

• Mr Huey Tan, APAC Privacy and Compliance, Accenture, UK

• Mr Scott Taylor, Vice President and Chief Privacy Officer, Hewlett-Packard, US

香港及澳門

Hong Kong and Macau

香港大學社會科學研究中心總監及公署科技發展常務委員會成員白景崇教授

Prof John Bacon-Shone, Director, Social Sciences Research Centre, The

University of Hong Kong, and Member of the Standing Committee on

Technological Developments, the PCPD

公署資訊科技顧問張宗頤博士

Dr Henry Chang, Information Technology Advisor, the PCPD

香港大學法律學院教授張善喻教授

Prof Anne S Y Cheung, Professor, Faculty of Law, The University of Hong Kong

香港個人資料私隱專員蔣任宏先生

Mr Allan Chiang, Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data, Hong Kong

香港大學計算機科學系副教授及公署科技發展常務委員會成員鄒錦沛博士

Dr K P Chow, Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science, The

University of Hong Kong, and Member of the Standing Committee on

Technological Developments, the PCPD

香港中文大學法律學院助理教授

Prof Stuart Hargreaves

Prof Stuart Hargreaves, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, The Chinese

University of Hong Kong

香港特別行政區政制及內地事務局首席助理秘書長梁何綺文女士

Mrs Philomena Leung, Principal Assistant Secretary, Constitutional and Mainland

Affairs Bureau, Hong Kong SAR Government

香港大學法律學院法律及資訊科技研究中心助理教授

Dr Marcelo Thompson

Dr Marcelo Thompson, Assistant Professor of Law, Deputy Director, Law and

Technology Centre, Faculty of Law, The University of Hong Kong

孖士打律師行高級顧問黄錦山先生

Mr Kenny Wong, Senior Consultant, Mayer Brown JSM

澳門特別行政區個人資料保護辦公室副主任楊崇蔚先生

Mr Ken Yang, Deputy Coordinator of the Office for Personal Data Protection,

Macau SAR Government